[Update]'If you don't take a job as a prostitute, we can stop your benefits'

..oder: Warum wir gesetzlich verpflichtet werden, anzuschaffen...

Eine witzige, und doch interessante Ente leistet sich der Telegraph:

Under Germany's welfare reforms, any woman under 55 who has been out of work for more than a year can be forced to take an available job � including in the sex industry � or lose her unemployment benefit. Last month German unemployment rose for the 11th consecutive month to 4.5 million, taking the number out of work to its highest since reunification in 1990.

Und wird dabei scheinbar noch aus Deutschland unterstützt:

"There is now nothing in the law to stop women from being sent into the sex industry," said Merchthild Garweg, a lawyer from Hamburg who specialises in such cases. "The new regulations say that working in the sex industry is not immoral any more, and so jobs cannot be turned down without a risk to benefits."

Für die, die des englischen nicht mächtig sind, hier ne kleine Kurzfassung:

Wer arbeitslos und unter 55 ist, kann gesetzlich dazu verdonnert werden, anzuschaffen.
Andernfalls könne ihm die Hartzkohle gestrichen werden.
Wissen die Engländer schon mehr als wir? :grin:

[Update] Ob das unter 1 Euro Job fallen wird? Ist ja schon "gemeinnützig" :grin:

(Quelle)

· Del.icio.us · Mr Wong · Google Buzz ·

Gespeichert unter:

Schon gelesen?

· Aber ick will doch nur .... !!!!1111

Da wurde 3 x wat jesacht zu “[Update]'If you don't take a job as a prostitute, we can stop your benefits'” »»

  1. Getippselt von Per am 03.02.05 um 1:25

    So are you saying this story is not true? Seems most people in teh english world is quoting this story and think it is true.
    (Sorry, German isn't my strong suit, but you seem to be able to read English :)

  2. Getippselt von Missi am 03.02.05 um 16:35

    I have done some research with officials and lawyers and they all deny
    any truth about those news. It seems that someone has spawned his or
    her version of a "worst case scenario" that should be viewed as evil
    satire more than a true fact.

    (Danke Johnny für die ßbersetzung :) )

  3. Getippselt von Per am 04.02.05 um 1:19

    Ok, Danke then :)

Ick will mal wat sagen... »»

Datenschutzhinweis

Yes, yes, its called a design limitation